But, the study did highlight that those students demonstrating good general clinical communication benefited from the training aspect of the METT, whereas low performing students did not gain. In conclusion, this pilot study showed there was no difference between the ability of medical undergraduate students assessed as being good communicators and those assessed as poor communicators to identify facial micro-expressions. The lowest quartile students showed no improvement (P = 0.799).
After training, students in the high quartile showed significant improvement in the recognition of facial micro-expressions (P = 0.014). No difference in pre-assessment scores was found between the lowest and highest quartile groups (P = 0.797). Students were also invited to provide their views on the training. These students completed the METT individually, recording pre- and post-assessment scores. The sample consisted of 24 first year medical students, 9 were from the lowest performance quartile in a communication skills OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Exam) station and 15 were from the highest performance quartile. This pilot study investigated first year medical students' (n = 75) identified as being either good or poor communicators abilities to detect emotional micro-expressions before and after training using the Micro Expression Training Tool (METT). Many studies focus on patient verbal cues as predictors of physicians' ability to recognize and address patient needs but this project focused on non-verbal cues in the form of facial micro-expressions. Patients provide emotional cues during consultations which may be verbal or non-verbal.
0 kommentar(er)
